A dispute rooted in a TikTok video arose at the outset of Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial Tuesday, as her attorneys moved to add a former mental hospital staff member to the witness list â one who had publicly accused witnesses of spreading “lies and misrepresentations” about the psychiatric facility where Clancy was treated weeks before she killed her three children.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan to add former McLean clinical social worker Emily Thorndike to the witness list, arguing that her years working on the same short-term unit could rebut what he described as a misleading picture of a “five star” hospital overflowing with treatment options that Clancy refused.
“Her involvement in this case came about after one of the prosecutors â I don’t recall which â made it out on direct examination that McLean is some kind of a five-star institution where the doctors, the psychiatrists, the psychotherapists, and the counselors were all banging into each other in the hallway trying to interview Miss Clancy, who was just blithely refusing care and treatment, which is not the case,” Reddington said.
WATCH: Defense seeks to add former McLean Hospital employee to witness list in Lindsay Clancy case
LINDSAY CLANCYS HUSBAND COULD TESTIFY FOR HER AT TRIAL OVER DEATHS OF THEIR THREE CHILDREN
“So now the jury is left with that image that McLean is purportedly some kind of a five-star hospital because they are affiliated, quote-unquote, with Harvard,” he continued.
LINDSAY CLANCYS EX-HUSBAND DETAILS PILL USE AS EXPERT SAYS EVIDENCE COULD SHAPE MURDER TRIAL
Reddington explained that he tracked down the TikToker, later identified as Thorndike, after she took to the social media platform to expose the level of treatment at the mental health facility.
“I saw her video saying that she could not stand for, and I quote, the lies and the misrepresentations from that witness stand about McLean Hospital.”
LINDSAY CLANCY DEFENSE SCORES EXTREMELY HELPFUL PSYCHOSIS CONCESSION AS EXPERT FLAGS NEXT HURDLE
Prosecutors, meanwhile, fired back that Thorndike had left McLean roughly a year before Clancys stay, had no firsthand knowledge of her treatment and had been following the trial online before posting her opinions online.
WATCH: Court debates new witness relevance over McLean Hospital staffing
Sullivan appeared hesitant to let Thorndike to grade the quality of Clancys hospital care.
“This is not Tripadvisor,” the judge quipped, saying he would not permit a battle over whether McLean deserved five stars or two.
WATCH: Judge shuts down five-star hospital debate in Lindsay Clancy trial: This is not Tripadvisor
But Sullivan called the narrower question of staffing and available programs a “closer call” and took the defense motion under advisement. He has not ruled about whether or not to allow Thorndike to take the witness stand.
