Two years ago, on April 18, 2024, New York Police Department officers arrested 108 students at s “Gaza Solidarity Encampment,” triggering a wave of campus chaos that swept the nation and the world.Â
What followed was among the darkest chapters in American higher education: , swastikas painted on buildings, American flags set ablaze, and more than 3,000 arrested for trespassing, vandalism and worse.
While it sparked widespread calls for campus reform â and strident efforts by the Trump administration to hold universities accountable â data suggests that the period left deep scars on university life, particularly an ongoing culture of fear and self-censorship.
FIREs 2026 college free speech survey shows that 91% of students now self-censor at least some of the time in conversations with classmates. Israel and Palestine are the most feared topics for open dissent, just ahead of abortion and transgender rights. At two prominent universities, 88% of students now pretend to be more progressive than they really are.
Fear of social reprisal drives the trend, but it is no doubt reinforced by acts of violence against conservatives, including the last year. Support for such acts continues to grow. The FIRE study shows that one in three students now believe violence can sometimes be justified to stop a speaker, a 70% increase since 2022.Â
The fear also extends to classrooms: roughly nine in 10 students self-censor in conversations with professors. There is little wonder why. In 1989, liberal professors outnumbered conservatives by roughly two to one. By the mid 2010s, the ratio was five to one. Today, across the humanities departments at Yale alone, Democrats outnumber Republicans 72-to-1. What few conservative faculty remain often hide their political views in order to keep their jobs.
As one University of Oklahoma student put it, “Why would I disagree with my professors [sic] strong and open political opinions when he is the one grading everything?”
This self-censorship harms everyone, progressives not least of all. Shielding ideas from challenge renders fragile both the ideas and those who hold them.
The greatest victim is America itself. When young people spend four formative years practicing self-censorship, they do not shed that habit at graduation. They carry it into journalism, business, law, medicine, and their lives as citizens.
All around us today, we are seeing what happens when elites â at universities and beyond â use fear in an attempt to force ideological conformity onto the country. Trust vanishes, discourse hardens, and our people stop understanding each other. Society starts to fray.
While the post-Gaza campus climate is tragic for America, hope remains. Pushback from the Trump administration is yielding results. DEI programs are being shuttered and many universities have adopted institutional neutrality policies that restrain them from taking positions on political and social topics.
But universities have more to do. Much more. Their goal should be to recover the vision of Mortimer Adler, who helped pioneer academic freedom standards at the University of Chicago. He believed that the purpose of higher education was “to develop free human beings who know how to use their minds and are able to think for themselves.”
This requires restoring true intellectual diversity among the faculty. Universities would also be wise to get a pulse on what students really believe, such as through anonymous surveys, and then publicly commit to defending all viewpoints. Alumni and donors can play a role, too, by tying support to free inquiry metrics.
Above all, we need the higher education system to understand its role in the formation of virtue, particularly that greatest of civic virtues â courage. Without it, we cannot speak or defend truth, maintain integrity when unpopular, or foster the habits of mind required for self-governance.
The Gaza prote
